Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 295 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has an overall score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A01's 71.6 score. The HTC U11 is a noticeably older and somewhat heavier phone than Galaxy A01, but HTC was able to make it just a little bit thinner anyway. HTC U11 has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and way more pixels per inch in the display.
HTC U11 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC U11 also has a greater amount of RAM. The HTC U11 counts with more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
HTC U11 counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Galaxy A01 one. The HTC U11 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture, a lot better video resolution and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A01, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.