Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-01-20 | 2016-03-31 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| $ 100.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G5 has a score of 76.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. The LG G5 body is thinner than Galaxy A01, but it is just a little bit heavier and was released many years before. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG G5 has 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A01 has Android 11, providing the user some extra features.
The LG G5 counts with a CPU that is very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy A01, because although the LG G5 has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory. LG G5 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A01, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher display pixel density and a way better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The LG G5 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A01, because it has 32 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG G5 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a higher 16 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A01 features a bit longer battery duration than LG G5, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although LG G5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the LG G5, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A01, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.