Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than Galaxy A01, getting an 85.4 score against 71.6. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the LG K92 has older 10 version and Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version. The LG K92 is a way heavier device than the Galaxy A01, but both of them are equally thin.
The LG K92 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a larger screen and more pixels per display inch. The LG K92 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
LG K92 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG K92 also has more RAM. LG K92 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A01, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size. LG K92 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures, a lot better video resolution, a much better resolution camera and a much bigger sensor taking way better quality photos and videos.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A01. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A01, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.