Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is better than the Galaxy A01, getting an 82.5 score against 71.6. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A01 has Android 11. LG V30S ThinQ is an older and just a bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A01, but LG managed to make it thinner anyway.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a way better pixel quantity per inch of screen, a little bit larger display and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A01, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better battery life than Galaxy A01, because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos, a way larger diafragm aperture, a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A01. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A01, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.