Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A01's score of 71.6. Despite of the fact LG V35 ThinQ is older and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A01, it's design is still thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A01, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way higher pixel number per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A01, because it has a way bigger camera aperture, a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality, a camera in the back with more mega pixels and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy A01, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A01. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A01, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.