Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. Although the LG V40 ThinQ is older and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A01, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better screen than Galaxy A01, because it has way more pixels per inch of screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit larger screen. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ has a superior camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A01, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A01, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.