Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A01's 71.6 global score. The LG Velvet design is just a little thinner but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. The LG Velvet features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a better pixel amount in each inch of display and a bigger screen. The LG Velvet features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A01, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The LG Velvet has a much better battery performance than Galaxy A01, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size. The LG Velvet features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a back camera with much more MP, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
LG Velvet costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A01, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.