Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is a lot better than Galaxy A01's 71.6 score. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Wing has an older 10 version while Galaxy A01 has Android 11. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG Wing body is noticeably heavier and much thicker than Galaxy A01.
The LG Wing features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger screen, a higher pixels number in each inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2460. The LG Wing has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has 6 GB more RAM.
LG Wing has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
LG Wing features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Wing features greater battery life than Galaxy A01, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A01, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.