Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. Although it's the best phone in this review, Motorola edge is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy A01. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola edge has an older 10 version and Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version.
The Motorola edge counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola edge features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger screen, a better number of pixels per display inch and a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Motorola edge has a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy A01, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola edge features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A01, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size. The Motorola edge shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A01, because it has a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A01. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A01, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.