Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. Even though the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is newer than Samsung Galaxy A01, it is just a bit thicker and a lot heavier. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A01 counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger screen, a higher pixel number in each display inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much larger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A01, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.