Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z3 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A01 has Android 11. The Moto Z3 is an older and just a little bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy A01, but Motorola was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a much better 1080 x 2160px resolution, a greater pixels count in each inch of display and a little bigger screen. The Moto Z3 features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A01, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z3 features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the Galaxy A01 one. The Motorola Moto Z3 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Motorola Moto Z3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A01. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A01, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.