Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than Galaxy A01's global score of 71.6. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Motorola One Vision construction is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A01. Motorola One Vision counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Vision also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One Vision features a better looking display than Galaxy A01, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2520px, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit bigger display. Motorola One Vision takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a way higher (4K) video resolution, a lot larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola One Vision counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A01, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Vision features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.