Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 295 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A01's global score of 71.6. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version while Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a extremely newer and much thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A01, but it is also way heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A01 has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A01 counts with a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light situations, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way better video quality.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A01, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A01, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.