Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Samsung Galaxy A01, with a score of 91.3 against 71.6. The Galaxy A52 5G construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A01, but it's extremely heavier. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a little better processing power than Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a little bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a greater pixel quantity per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A01, because it has 112 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy A01, because it has a lot better (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.