Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A01's 71.6 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A01, but it's much heavier. Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger display, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater pixels amount in each screen inch.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos, a way better video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A01, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.