Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A01, with a general score of 98.9 against 71.6. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a lot heavier but a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a larger screen and way more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has 112 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A01, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A01. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A01, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.