Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy Note 5's design is a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A01, although it's somewhat heavier and was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 also has a lot better pixel amount per inch in the display and a much better 2560 x 1440px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A01 has just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has just 16 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A01 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores (but slower). Samsung Galaxy A01 and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 count with very similar battery performance. Galaxy Note 5 features a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a larger aperture, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera in the back with a better resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A01, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.