Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than Galaxy A01, with a score of 89 against 71.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note10 and Galaxy A01 were released with only a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is just a little thinner but also a little bit heavier than Galaxy A01. Galaxy Note10 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280, a little bit bigger display and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Note10 features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A01, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations, a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A01, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A01, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.