Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.0 |
| 2020-01-20 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A01 has a score of 71.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's general score of 71.5. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy A01 has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has Android 4.0 version. The Galaxy A01 is a just a little bit thinner but heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket.
Galaxy A01 features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Galaxy A01 also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster). The Galaxy S III Cricket features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 720px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixel number in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A01 has more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has just 16 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A01 has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
Galaxy A01 shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A01 also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and a camera in the back with a much better 13 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A01 costs exactly the same than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.