Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A01's general score of 71.6. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy S22 body is much newer and a bit thinner, but a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A01.
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a way better screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a higher screen density and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a lot better video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A01. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A01, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.