Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is way better than Galaxy A01's 71.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a way newer phone than Galaxy A01, although it is heavier and a little bit thicker. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy A01 has Android 11, offering some additional features.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger display, a way greater pixel count per inch of display and a lot better 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos, a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A01, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A01, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.