Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-20 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.33 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A01's score of 71.6. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 construction is way lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A01.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a lot better display than Galaxy A01, because it has a little bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A01 counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a bigger aperture, a lot higher video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels. Samsung Galaxy S25 has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A01, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features better battery duration than Galaxy A01, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S25, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A01, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.