Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than the Galaxy A01's general score of 71.6. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is thicker and heavier than Galaxy A01.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a higher pixels number in each inch of screen, a little larger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor giving a lot worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A01. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A01, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.