Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is way better than Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. Although Galaxy Z Flip and the Galaxy A01 were released only 1 months apart, Galaxy Z Flip's construction is somewhat thinner but also heavier. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version, so it provides you some extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Z Flip features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a larger screen, a better count of pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636. The Galaxy Z Flip has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A01, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster processor than Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip features a superior camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A01. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A01, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.