Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 100.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than Galaxy A01's score of 71.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Galaxy A01 were only released with a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is heavier but somewhat thinner. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a larger screen, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a greater pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A01, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a lot better (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A01, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A01. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A01, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.