Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Galaxy A01, with a score of 94.6 against 71.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is extremely heavier but somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A01, and they were released with only a couple of months difference. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a much bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a higher pixel number per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A01, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.