Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 is much better than the Galaxy A01, having a global score of 79.3 against 71.6. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Despite being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco X2 is an a little bit thicker and much heavier device than the Galaxy A01.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, more pixels per inch of display and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a much more megapixels back camera. Samsung Galaxy A01 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has just 16 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.