Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A01.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A01, because it has a larger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better display pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 48 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger aperture for better low light captures and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A01. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A01, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.