Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is better than Galaxy A02s, with an 87.1 score against 74.5. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus design is thinner than the Galaxy A02s, although it is a bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a better display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a better screen density.
IPhone 8 Plus counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A02s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a much higher (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy A02s has a superior battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has an 86% greater battery size.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 8 Plus, else you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A02s, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.