Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 74.5. The iPhone X construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A02s, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Apple iPhone X counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone X features a lot better display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a much greater pixel count per display inch. The Apple iPhone X features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a worse resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures.
IPhone X counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A02s features a really longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone X, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A02s, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.