Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is better than Galaxy A02s's 74.5 score. Although Apple iPhone XR is extremely older than the Galaxy A02s, it's body is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. The Apple iPhone XR features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A02s, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone XR features a brighter display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 828 x 1792px and a little bit better screen density. The Galaxy A02s counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The iPhone XR has a better camera than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A02s has a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XR, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A02s, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.