Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is much better than the Galaxy A02s's 74.5 score. The iPhone XS design is just a bit lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A02s, even though it was released 2 years before. Apple iPhone XS has a superior processor than Galaxy A02s, because although it has 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and more RAM memory.
Apple iPhone XS features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a lot higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen. The Apple iPhone XS shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
Galaxy A02s features a much better memory to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A02s counts with a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A02s, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.