Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A02s, getting a overall score of 80 against 74.5. The Google Pixel 3 body is somewhat thinner and way lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, although it was released 2 years before. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2160px resolution and a much greater pixel number per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A02s features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A02s features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72% larger battery size. The Google Pixel 3 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and a much better (4K) video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also cheaper, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.