Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, with a overall score of 87.5 against 74.5. Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide very similar OS features. Even when the Google Pixel 4a 5G and Samsung Galaxy A02s were only released 2 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is thinner and lighter.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a lot higher display pixel density. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low light environments. The Galaxy A02s features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A02s has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A02s. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A02s, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.