Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A02s's global score of 74.5. The HTC One M9 is a way older and a little thicker phone than the Galaxy A02s, but HTC made it somewhat lighter anyway. These phones have Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Galaxy A02s has Android 11.
The HTC One M9 has a greater processing power than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processing unit. The HTC One M9 has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A02s has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A02s also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. HTC One M9 takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a much better video quality.
The Galaxy A02s counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
The HTC One M9 is a bit more expensive than Galaxy A02s, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.