Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a score of 77, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A02s's 74.5 global score. Even though the HTC U Ultra is incredibly older than Galaxy A02s, it's design is lighter and thinner. The HTC U Ultra features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a much greater display pixel density.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processor in Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although the HTC U Ultra has 4 less CPU cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory. HTC U Ultra features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A02s, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A02s features a very superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The HTC U Ultra takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a back camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy HTC U Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A02s, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.