Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A02s's 74.5 overall score. These phones use Android operating system, but the LG G7 Fit has a newer 8.1 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11, so it provides you some nice extra features and performance optimizations. LG G7 Fit is an way older phone than Samsung Galaxy A02s, but LG managed to make it somewhat thinner and extremely lighter.
LG G7 Fit has a lot better screen than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a lot higher pixels count per display inch. The LG G7 Fit has more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 Fit and Samsung Galaxy A02s count with very similar CPUs, because although the LG G7 Fit has less processing cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory. LG G7 Fit captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the LG G7 Fit also has a camera in the back with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy A02s counts with a very superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.