Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, getting a global score of 82.5 against 74.5. These devices come with Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11. The LG V30S ThinQ design is thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A02s, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a much greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen. LG V30S ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A02s, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a little better performance than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A02s has a superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ features a superior camera than Galaxy A02s, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much larger camera aperture.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A02s, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.