Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, with a general score of 81.3 against 74.5. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, even though it was released many years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a much higher pixels amount per inch in the display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a lot larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and a back camera with more mega pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A02s, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A02s counts with a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A02s, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.