Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, with an 81.2 score against 74.5. These phones come with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is noticeably older than Samsung Galaxy A02s, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A02s, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. LG V40 ThinQ captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a way larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy A02s features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A02s, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.