Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s's 74.5 general score. LG Velvet's design is thinner and a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A02s, even when they were released only a few months apart. The LG Velvet counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A02s, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460, a greater pixel density and a little bit larger screen.
The LG Velvet has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG Velvet counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A02s has improved battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A02s, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a much higher (4K) video definition and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The LG Velvet costs a lot more money than Galaxy A02s, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.