Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is way better than the Galaxy A02s, with an 89.6 score against 74.5. Both devices we are comparing come with Android operating system, but Motorola edge has an older 10 version while Galaxy A02s has Android 11. Even though Motorola edge and Galaxy A02s were released only a couple months apart, the Motorola edge design is just a bit thicker but also a little bit lighter.
Motorola edge counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a quite larger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola edge counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola edge counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A02s has a bit superior battery life than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola edge features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a camera with much more mega pixels and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A02s. If you want to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A02s, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.