Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, having a 77.6 score against 74.5. Even though the Motorola Moto Z3 is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, it's construction is noticeably thinner and lighter. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple additional features and optimized performance.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a brighter display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a much better 1080 x 2160 resolution. The Moto Z3 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has more RAM memory. Moto Z3 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy A02s has a way better battery life than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A02s, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.