Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, having an 87 score against 74.5. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Motorola razr (2020) is a a little lighter and thinner device than Samsung Galaxy A02s, even when they were released only a few months apart.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 876 x 2142 and more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A02s counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 79% bigger battery size.
Motorola razr (2020) captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light photography, a much better (4K) video definition and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A02s. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A02s, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.