Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Galaxy A02s, with a 92.9 score against 74.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is a little thinner and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy A02s, even when they were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Galaxy A02s has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bit larger screen and a greater screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way higher video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A02s, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A02s has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A02s. If you want to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A02s, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.