Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A02s's score of 74.5. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is a little heavier but thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, and both were released only a couple months apart. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 9 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A02s, because it has a lot more pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a lot better video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A02s has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A02s. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A02s, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.