Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than Galaxy A02s's overall score of 74.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Galaxy A02s has Android 11, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and increased performance. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy A02s, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A02s.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture and a lot better video definition.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A02s. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A02s, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.