Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s, with a score of 93.4 against 74.5. The Galaxy S22 construction is newer, lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A02s. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11, so it gives a couple nice extra features and better performance.
The Galaxy S22 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a lot better screen than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a larger aperture for better low light images and videos. The Samsung Galaxy A02s counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A02s features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 35% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A02s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S22, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A02s, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.