Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Galaxy A02s, having a score of 88.5 against 74.5. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Galaxy A02s has Android 11 version. Even though Galaxy Z Flip is older than Galaxy A02s, it's construction is extremely thinner and just a little lighter.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a lot greater pixel number per inch of screen, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a better camera than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A02s features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A02s. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy A02s, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.