Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a general score of 82.2, which is better than the Galaxy A02s's 74.5 score. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Xperia XZ2 Premium design is noticeably older, somewhat heavier and noticeably thicker than the Galaxy A02s. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixels density and a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840px.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xperia XZ2 Premium has slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 624 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Xperia XZ2 Premium takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a way higher (4K) video definition. Samsung Galaxy A02s features a much better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A02s. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A02s, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.